@hausdorff80 You say you don't believe in God yet you complain about him all the time. Is it because you don't believe God would be this way
— Interzone119 (@Interzone119) October 20, 2013
@hausdorff80 I'm trying to understand. If you don't believe God is real, why complain about him?
— Interzone119 (@Interzone119) October 20, 2013
I think this is a really good question, why do I bother complaining about a God who I don't even think is real? Ultimately it is the same reason any atheist would have a blog, or care about any of this stuff at all, it's because Christians think this God is real. Their belief in God affects their actions in ways that I believe are negative for society overall. A simple example is that we have to fight tooth and nail to get evolution taught in schools, it's a proven science, but people see it as a threat to their faith and do everything they can to prevent it from being taught to children. (I'm sure that's not quite they way they would put it, but that's the way I see it)
(Photo credit: Tom Paton) |
One last thing, when I say that the God described in the bible is a monster, I'm a little concerned that it might sound like I came in with this bias. I started this project with no idea what I was going to come across, I knew that Christians will generally reference good things from the bible and atheists will generally reference bad things, but I had no idea how how much of each there is in the bible. I honestly came in prepared for the possibility that the atheists were being super biased and the vast majority of the bible was really positive stuff, that's just not what I have found.
I don't typically complain about God, any more than I complain about Voldemort. God doesn't matter. It's the idiots out there that DO believe in God that are the problem. I'm much more apt to complain about the believers and their absurd beliefs than I am to make fun of the imaginary friend in the sky they believe in.
ReplyDeleteBut if there was a huge group of people who were constantly talking about how awesome Voldemort is, I could see myself saying "but Voldemort did X!"
DeleteYou can't say Voldemort did X because Voldemort never actually did anything, he's a character in a series of books, just like God is a character in the Bible. I honestly don't find myself complaining about God as much as I complain about his idiot followers.
DeleteSure, but if people thought the harry potter books were nonfiction, and claimed that Voldemort was good, I would point to passages in the books where he is clearly not good. I suppose you could argue that I'm complaining about the believer, both that he believes in Voldemort and that he thinks he's a good character. But I would just be focusing on the fact that he's really evil rather than trying to convince him that Voldemort's not real.
DeleteAlthough, if the person did not claim Voldemort was real, but just said that the fictional character was good, I imagine the conversation wouldn't be terribly different on my end :)
For me it really comes down to the fact that these gods are affecting peoples decisions in politicial and social life. Its these decisions which make my life and others harder, so that’s why I complain.
ReplyDeleteI agree completely. Those types of things are what motivated me to start my blog in the first place. Although that does get back to Cephus' point a bit, focusing on the believers in the God rather than the God himself
DeleteThat I can understand. But if we address the idiocy of the texts on which these beliefs are based,we break the whole structure down. Then the fundamentalists which could start up again can't as they have no idiotic texts to base it on.
DeleteTotally agree :) That's part of why I like attacking the character of God in the bible, even though I don't think he's real.
DeleteMaybe I'm doing it the wrong way, but the way I handle it is to say, *if* your god is the way he is described in the Bible, then he is a "moral monster" (quoting Richard Dawkins) not worth worshiping. Then I try to refrain from saying something like, "If you worship a 'moral monster' who actually exists then you are yourself immoral." The closest I came was when I talked to a couple of Jehovah's Witnesses and I said that refusal to give a blood transfusion to a child to save his or her life is morally reprehensible to me." Then she tried to say that science has shown that blood transfusions are dangerous to life, etc. Another time, two Jehovah's Witnesses wouldn't even talk to me when I said I am an atheist. They weren't rude, but only said, "then you won't be interested in what we have to say" (he was wrong, but I wasn't going to force him to debate with me, LOL). My name is Daniel, but my computer has a tendency to hiccup when I try to log in to comment (partly because of No Script).
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by Daniel. I don't think you are doing it the wrong way at all. I think there is an important distinction between criticizing a person and criticizing an idea they hold. Often it gets mixed up so it is worthwhile to point it out.
Delete